The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized a mistake and reflects the determination, and that the total amount of damage to each of the crimes of this case is merely 1,825,000 won, etc. is favorable to the Defendant.

However, in light of the circumstances of each of the crimes of this case and its applicable laws, the crime of this case is not good, and the defendant has been punished more than ten times, and the defendant has been punished for larceny more than two times and has been sentenced to imprisonment more than twenty times. In particular, on December 22, 2011, the Daegu District Court has been sentenced more than ten months to imprisonment with prison labor due to fraud, etc., and was sentenced on August 31, 201, and the execution of the punishment was completed in the Daegu Prison on August 31, 2012, and was committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated offense period, and did not make efforts to recover damage to the victims after the crime, and took an attitude to avoid the demand of an investigative agency for attendance.

In full view of the above-mentioned normal relationship, the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant and all the other circumstances shown in the records and arguments, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.