logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.05.30 2013고단597
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a taxi for rocketing other business purposes.

On January 28, 2013, the Defendant driven the above taxi on December 12:34, 2013, while driving the 84-lane of the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant continued to drive the 5-lane of the 84-lane of the 3-lane of the 84-lane of the eroscop from the eroscopb

In this case, the driver has a duty of care to observe the signal and safely drive the signal because the signal was installed and the signal was red at the time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the left by the victim D(43 years old) who was driven by the victim D(43 years old) who was to turn to the left from the right side of the sleeped elementary school located on the right side of the sleeping direction when he neglected to turn to the left due to his negligence in violation of the signal. The Defendant turned to the front part of the 110 ECA 110E Sitoba which was driven by the victim D(43 years old).

The Defendant suffered approximately 8 weeks of occupational injury from the 1st emission frame, which requires the victim to receive approximately 8 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the degree of damage on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not minor, the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the circumstances of the accident and the fact that the defendant was the first offender and the victim agreed smoothly;

arrow