All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., both types of punishment) of the lower court against Defendant A, a person subject to a request for an attachment order, and a person subject to a request for a probation order (hereinafter “Defendant A”), and Defendant B (a punishment of imprisonment for three years, a suspended execution of sentence five years, a probation, a community service order 200 hours, Defendant B: imprisonment for one year, a suspended execution of one year, a suspended execution of two years, and a community service order 80 hours) is too unreasonable

2. Determination

A. The lower court’s determination on the part of the Defendant’s instant case on the assertion of unreasonable sentencing against Defendant A: (1) The Defendant’s act of this case spreads the gasoline prepared in advance by the Defendant to the surviving victim, burns the legal party to which the victim was attached, and attempted to kill the victim, and thus, the nature of the crime is bad; (2) the legal party to which the Defendant was absent may cause harm to human life if it leads to a large fire, which is a multi-household resident, and thus, may cause considerable social danger; (3) the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime, is against the Defendant; (4) there was no history of criminal punishment; (4) the Defendant voluntarily surrenders to another household or did not cause any harm to human life after the Defendant’s existing building fire-prevention; (3) the victim and the victim who became an adult in an unfluened environment, who did not go against the Defendant’s normal motive to commit the instant crime; and (4) the Defendant did not actively appear to have committed the instant crime.