logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.05.15 2015고정224
여객자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who owns a small-sized cargo vehicle for business use B. B. 6.

A person who intends to operate a passenger transport business shall prepare a business plan and obtain a license from the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.

Nevertheless, at around September 15:32, 2014, the Defendant carried a passenger transport business without a license, such as boarding a male guest who did not possess cargo at the direct Eup office in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-si, Seoan-si, Seoan-gu, Incheon-si as well as transporting 4,000 won in return for the boarding of a male guest to the subordinate apartment located in the Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, and receiving 3,000 won from customers by means of such means as receiving 3,00 won from the direct Eup office in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan, Seoan-gu,

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each report on commercial transport activities;

1. Application of two CDs-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article of the facts constituting an offense, and subparagraph 1 of Article 90 of the Passenger Transport Service Act that selects punishment, and Articles 4 (1) of the same Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) have been punished four times by a fine for the same offense as the instant several laws since 2013, and in the process, despite the fact that a request for formal trial against the summary order was made in the same manner and the amount of fine has been mitigated twice, the same punishment as the order has been repeated.

arrow