A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a “D” Chinese house employee.

At around 02:10 on February 6, 2014, the Defendant heard the phrase “f” from H to H on the ground that he was able to drink alcohol at the “F” point located adjacent to the Jeonju-gun, U.S. E, and that he was able to drink alcohol on other table table (38 years of age) and she was able to cut off the victim G (38 years of age) who was drinking alcohol on other table table in the process of calculating, and that he was able to treat the said horses from H on the ground that he was able to cut off, and then discovered that he was able to stop the victim’s left part of the passenger’s car, which is a dangerous thing that he was under the influence of the Defendant’s age. However, the Defendant called “D restaurant” located adjacent to the rest of the Defendant’s age, and she was able to open the victim’s car to the left part of the passenger’s car, and then she was able to open the victim’s car to the left part of the car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. A medical certificate, etc. or a copy of medical records;

1. Photographsic photographs, such as knife, and photo on the part of the injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (a point agreed with the victim, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing below);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., the Defendant, as well as the victim, etc., did not refrain even after the termination of dispute with the victim, and used a dangerous knife as a dangerous object, and used the background of the instant crime, the implements of the crime, and the method of committing the crime.