The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the fraudulent act committed in the instant facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, it did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal, failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the intentional acquisition or fraudulent act in fraud.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty on the part of the Defendant’s charged charge 6 once the list of crimes attached to the lower judgment, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the intent of unlawful acquisition in fraud

3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.