1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserted by the defendant in the trial as to the plaintiffs' claim for compensation for losses on the remaining land does not differ from that of the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court is re-examined, the decision of the first instance court which rejected the defendant's claim and accepted the plaintiffs' claim is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning for the court's reasoning for this case is that the "this judgment" in the last sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance and the first sentence of the 9th 10th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th and 8th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st th th th th th th 2"

On the premise that normal transaction prices or compensation examples of neighboring similar land are not necessarily to be taken into account, the Defendant asserts to the purport that adopting them is erroneous since the court’s appraisal of the remaining land is insufficient to prove whether the remaining land and land category are different or normal transaction prices are different.

However, in light of the result of the appraisal by the court appraiser for the remaining land, the above.