Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand won.

Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be converted into one day.

Punishment of the crime

On January 3, 2015, the Defendant partly revised the facts of the crime in line with the evidence relationship. The Defendant, at the community hall located in the Gu-si, Si around 13:00 on January 3, 2015, and the victim D did not receive any separate back money other than 16:4 million won in terms of personnel expenses, etc. from the waste company, and the victim was not included in the subject of the establishment of the Gu-si destruction area for the reason that the victim was the chairperson of the measure. However, even though it was not included in the subject of the establishment of the Gu-si destruction area, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by publicly pointing out false facts by reporting to 150 residents of the village as the chairperson of the measure and receiving a separate back money other than 16.5 million won as the personnel expenses of the chairperson of the measure, and the Defendant was unable to destroy D's large field by d's preferential treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Part of the statement of the accused in the investigation report (the complainant and the summary of the statement of the suspect);

1. In full view of the investigation report (the attached record, the village resident's statement, one copy of the statement of passbook transaction, one copy of the statement of passbook transaction, one copy of the business confirmation document), investigation report (as to attachment of a statement of deposit payment), investigation report (as to the relative confirmation of the person in charge of viewing and listening), investigation report (as to the confirmation of the amount of deposit in the former part of the transcript), the part of the community resident's statement in the above 4 statement, the understanding of the purport of the community resident's statement in the above 4 statement, and the fact that the defendant also has technical problems in the process of raising his problem, it is reasonable to say that the defendant's statement at the same time and time, the contents received from the damaged company and 16.4 million won received from the damaged company are not the chairperson of the countermeasure that served for village residents, but it is appropriate to do so.

Even if so, it is clear that there is money received separately and denied, and at the time, the defendant is only denied simply by the victim.