1. Attached real estate list / [1] The land in [2] is owned by the Plaintiff and each land in [2] is attached to the real estate list.

1. According to the purport of evidence No. 1 and the whole pleadings as to the claim for partition of co-owned property, the Plaintiff and the Defendants shared each share of the land listed in the separate sheet [1] and [2] [3/364, Defendant C3/364, Defendant C24/364, Defendant D24/364, Defendant E-12/364, Defendant F24/364, Defendant G28/364, Defendant H28/364, Defendant H24/364, Defendant I24/364, and Defendant I12/364, respectively. Thus, the Plaintiff, a co-owner of each of the lands of this case, may claim partition of each of the lands of this case, against the Defendants, who are co-owners.

2. According to the evidence as seen earlier, on July 2, 2007, the GJ (hereinafter referred to as the “J”) of Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter referred to as the “J”) divided Lban 111 square meters into 364 square meters, and on July 14, 201, Mban 37 square meters was divided from the land above Lban 37 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “Attachment 74 square meters,” which is the land of this case, is the land indicated in [1]]. After the division, K site and M land were changed into each road (hereinafter referred to as the “Attachment 253 square meters and Mban 37 square meters, which are the land of this case) and it is reasonable for the Plaintiff and the Defendants to enter the real estate list [1] as the land owned by the Plaintiff, and the land list [2] as the joint ownership of shares in the Plaintiff and the Defendants.

3. In conclusion, each of the lands of this case is divided as stated in the Disposition No. 1, and it is so decided as per Disposition.