A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 10, 2013, the Defendant destroyed property damage equivalent to KRW 10,00,00 in the market price by breaking the FF 3 carcoo operated by the victim E in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the ground that sexual traffic women are not women.

2. At around 23:05 on the same day as Paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) 23:05 day before the Victim H(66 years of age) house located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant saw the victim’s face, fluoring the gate, fluoring the gate, and fluoring the face of the victim, fluoring the gate three times, without any reason, led the victim’s face, walking the gate face, etc. four times, so that the victim cannot know the treatment days.

3. Performance of official duties.

A. At around 23:18 of the same day as above, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender for the above criminal facts, and was in flight along with the 29 patrol car in the I Zone, and took a bath to K as to whether he would be able to take the position of J in the circumstances surrounding the said earth zone belonging to the said earth zone, and to stop this, the Defendant assaulted K on the ground that he would walk the left part of the arms one time to walk.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders.

B. At around 23:25 on the same day as Paragraph 1, the Defendant 23:25, on the part of the I district located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L, spited several times of spitations, following the Defendant’s Megain M of the circumstances belonging to the I district M of the said I district M of the said I district M of the said I district M of the said I district M of the said I district M of “I district lafe,” “Is my dogfe,” “Is my dogfe,” “I

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the investigation, etc. of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of K, M, H, and E;

1. Application of each statute on photographs of damage;

1. Article 257(1) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;