logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2012.02.17 2011고단1824
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 2008, the Defendant borrowed KRW 700,000 from C for business purposes, among which he was unable to repay KRW 500,000,000, which he was urged to repay the debt from C on or around February 2, 2008, and received discount from E, who is the representative director of DD development, and paid the above debt, but the check was agreed with E to be responsible and settled.

On February 18, 2008, the Defendant knew of the relation to the real estate consulting service contract and told F to the effect that “I would like to introduce a person who is able to discount the 450 million won foot check issued by the above company as the E representative director of the E representative director of the in-house D D D D development is currently conducting apartment business in the lot construction and Pyeongtaek-dong, and it will be clearly settled,” and that “I would like to make payment on the date of payment if I would like to know that I would like to deliver the Defendant’s horse to B, who is the birth of the victim, and make payment on the date of payment if I would like to do so.

However, in fact, the above statement of the number of units was borrowed by the Defendant under the agreement with E to pay the Defendant a debt amounting to KRW 500 million, and H, a corporation that operated by the Defendant, was unable to pay the interest on the company's debt amounting to KRW 13 billion due to the failure to pay the company's debt amounting to KRW 13 billion due to the failure of the business. Although the real estate consulting service contract was concluded with F and the real estate consulting service contract was not run at all, there was no intention or ability to pay the above statement even if it is discounted by the victim, such as that the service cannot be paid due to the progress of

On February 20, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victims, issued one copy of the check number “K”, “K”, “D Development Representative E”, “Korean Bank Gangnam Branch”, “The date of issuance”, “450,000 won” and “450,000 won” to the victims on or around February 21, 2008, and issued one copy of the check number to the victims at the J office operated by the victims of the victim at the time of Pakistan.

arrow