A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 15, 2014, at around 16:20 on June 16, 2014, the Defendant was passing around the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the city bus No. C4 operated by the solar transport, and the Defendant was able to write down about five minutes of the victim’s right bucks by inserting left hand on the front of the Defendant’s left side of the seat.

Accordingly, the defendant committed indecent acts by taking advantage of the state of mental disorder of the victim who is a child or juvenile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police about D;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes 13 of a report on internal investigation (the attachment of CCTV data in buses) and photographs;

1. Article 7 (4) and (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 299 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. The main sentence of Article 21 (2) and Article 21 (4) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. The proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter “Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse”) [the Defendant’s act of violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes similar to this case has a history of being punished as an indecent act at a public place, but the Defendant’s act appears not to be a specific residential place, but to be contingent crime at a place moving like buses, subways, etc., and the effect of crime prevention and protection of victims due to disclosure of personal information is not significant. The punishment prescribed by this court is determined by this court, and probation, taking the treatment courses for sexual assault, and registering personal information appears to have the effect of preventing recidivism to a certain extent. On the other hand, if the Defendant notifies disclosure to a university student 19 years of age, it is likely that the Defendant’s future and social activities might be significantly restricted.