logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2020.05.14 2019나51441
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the

(A) On March 29, 2020, the Plaintiff filed an application for rejection on March 25, 2020 that the method of attack and defense as stated in the written reply falls under the actual time attack and defense, and thus ought to be dismissed. On April 6, 2020, the court rendered a ruling dismissing the Plaintiff’s above rejection request. The Plaintiff filed an appeal against the said rejection rejection ruling on several occasions. However, the decision rejecting the application was based on the court order, and the decision dismissing the application does not fall under “decision or order dismissing the application for the litigation procedure” under Article 439 of the Civil Procedure Act, which is generally subject to the appeal, and there is no special provision that can be dissatisfied with this decision, and thus, the Plaintiff cannot file an appeal against the decision. For this reason, the first instance judgment was justifiable, and thus, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.

arrow