A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Seized evidence 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

In around 2015, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s objections that the victim C (V, 46 years of age) who became aware of in the Dong-dong square located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, had a lot of objections against the Defendant, who was aged ordinary.

The defendant around 15:54 on April 25, 2016, around 15:54, as to why the victim Da and the defendant " Doese" while drinking together with drinking in the Dong-dong square located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

“In order to make the horses as “ and to use it for the collection of spawn,” the net value (35 cm in total length, 5 cm in diameter, 8 cm in length) which is a dangerous object stored in the chemical group of the North Spath in the above rock station, and the spathn, “and the victim”.

“A person who is the young who is the young.”

Dr. One p. M. L.C.

“Fasting” was fluored.

Defendant 1 saw the victim as above, but the victim saw it hot, but the victim saw it as "I am in the same body of disease. I am in the body of the victim's left side once," and suffered bodily injury, such as head and other part of the body of the victim, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A list of seizure records (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;

1. A written diagnosis for an injury;

1. Application of victim photographs and CCTV photographs at the time of committing the crime;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act was against the defendant, and the confession was considered as favorable circumstances to the defendant.

However, the defendant has already been punished for the same kind of crime.