A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 11, 2020, at around 16:32, the Defendant: (a) laid off a garment on the front of the “C” restaurant located in Ulsan-gu B; and (b) performed alcohol on the front of the “C” restaurant; (c) took a bath for returning home from E (the age of 51) who was called out after receiving 112 report from neighboring residents; and (d) assaulted the right-hand end of the said E at one time to walk.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One to five years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] of the obstruction of performance of official duties: [Type 1] No person shall be subject to the obstruction of performance of official duties or coercion of official duties [the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] (the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] basic area, six months to one year and six months.

3. The defendant's decision on the sentence of this case recognized the crime of this case, there is no criminal record that exceeds the fine, and it is necessary to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties in order to establish national order and eradicate the light of public authority. The defendant's crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties of this case is not less complicated, and all other circumstances recorded in the records, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, etc., shall be determined as ordered within the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines.