Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant operates the "C Agent" with her husband, and the victim D (the age of 45) is a person who works in the "E Deputy Director" operated by her mother's father, and the recent side of the C agency and the Vice Director of E has been frequently disputed due to parking problems.

On July 16, 2015, the Defendant parked H cargo vehicle at the entrance of the third third executive officer of the E in order for C agency G to load goods at around 09:00, the Defendant argued that the parking problem is the parking problem by finding at the third executive officer of the E, the first executive officer of the E, would interfere with the passage of vehicles entering the third executive officer of the E, and the Defendant and the third executive officer.

E has returned to the Deputy Director.

Therefore, the indictment states that the defendant who caused the damage to the defendant following the above I was tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly and booming the body of the defendant, on the ground that he took a dynamic image image on a cell phone rather than complying with the above I, and the defendant's chest part of the victim's chest is sealed, and the indictment states that "the defendant's chest part is sealed and sealed," but even if it is corrected without the amendment to the indictment, it does not seem that even if it is corrected without the amendment to the indictment, it would be a substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his right of defense, so it shall

In addition to the floor, the victim suffered injury to cerebral leys of three weeks, where there is no open address in the two areas, which require approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on screen pictures taken against D mobile phones;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no fact that the defendant did not injure the victim at the time and place specified in the facts charged. Thus, the evidence adopted earlier is examined.