Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 15, 2015, the Defendant, “2016 Highly 621,” obtained one hand phone (gal jum 4) with the market value equivalent to KRW 900,000,000,000, in the c'C located in Gusi-si B around 2015.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim and embezzled it on his own idea.

On October 16, 2015, the Defendant, “2016, 622,” by phone, to the victim F at the studio E in the Gu-U.S. Si, Gu-si, Seoul, to supply the victim F with KRW 1,200 per turn on an emergency.

“To receive an order from the injured party who believed it at the end of 500 square meters,” the victim will receive goods from the factory located in Busan if the State deposits KRW 600,00 from the injured party, and supply them at the end of 500,000 to the injured party.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not sell both horses at the time and did not want to consume the money received from the injured party due to no particular income, so even if he received 600,000 won from the injured party, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to supply the victim with the turn 500,000 fire.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 600,00 to the post office account (Account Number: G) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim.

Even if the Defendant received money from the victim H, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to sell the goods.

Nevertheless, on October 5, 2015, the Defendant posted a notice on “sale of ASEAN clothes” at its home-based office Nos. 507 of the Gumi-si E Stud 507 on the Internet woop sales box.

The Defendant: (a) demanded the victim H ( South and North, 22 years of age) who has contacted with the Defendant to sell clothes as if he sold them; and (b) received 69,000 won from the post office G account under his name and received pecuniary benefits.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 High 621"

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police officer against D, I, and J.