logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2021.01.27 2020고단2775
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 13, 2020, the Defendant operated Crocketing car not covered by mandatory insurance on the road of two-lanes in front of the unit B building in Ansan-si around 09:10.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article 46 of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Compensation for Motor Vehicle Damages, and Selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The Defendant in this part of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On May 13, 2020, the Defendant driven the above car at around 09:10 and proceeded with the road of the member B and the two-lanes in front of the building in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and the road at the front of the building at the Silung-si.

In this case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by operating a direction indicator in the direction of trying to proceed with the vehicle driver, operating the steering system and operating the steering system accurately.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and operated the victim E (I, 54 years old) (I, 54 years old) who was going straight from the two-lanes of the same direction due to occupational negligence in which the defendant attempted to make a right-hand turn at the right-hand turn in the first lane.

The left side of the FF-learning car was received as the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a scarcity, which requires approximately six weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

B. After the prosecution of this case, the injured party expressed his intention that he does not want the punishment of the defendant.

C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow