The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the resident of Seongbuk-gu apartment unit B in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and the victim C(44) is the employee of the above apartment management office.

1. On January 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 15:20, the instant apartment complex 6 at the top of the same parking lot; (b) and (c) where the instant victim witnessed the urine urology while conducting dynasium and witnessing the urine urology “dys

In the case of paragraphs (b) and (c) “Abrupt here, she would not be frighten, but she would be dead, she would be dead, she would be dead,” and assault the victim’s right shoulder at one time by drinking a brush, such as flabing the balle, and flabing the balle.

2. On January 17, 2017, the Defendant, around 13:25, on the same side of the above apartment house 12, around 12, 2017, in relation to the work that the victim was carrying out the patrol of the apartment, and was in contact with the Defendant at the police.

In other words, “the contact” took a bath to “Isson, Isson,” and assaulted the victim’s right side by drinking once a week, with the victim’s right side, and continuing to be drinking.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

On May 4, 2017, after the institution of the instant prosecution, the victim may recognize the fact that he/she expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.