logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.10.15 2015고단653
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 5, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for six months due to occupational embezzlement in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 13, 2015.

The criminal defendant against the victim B of "2015 Highest 653" is a person who operates C, a Hdro manufacturing chain Co., Ltd.

Around January 15, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If 75 million won is paid to B, the Defendant would be repaid with interest by February 28, 2014.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the above amount due to poor financial standing, such as the monthly salary of employees at the time, and the amount of personal debts is KRW 00 million.

The Defendant received KRW 30 million from the victim on January 15, 2014, and KRW 45 million on January 29, 201, from each of the above C accounts.

"2015 Highest 677"

1. The Defendant against the victim E is a person operating a company (ju) G company located in the GumisisiroF.

On January 20, 2012, the defendant used almost foreign products to the victim in the office of the above company "In Korea, it is very difficult for Korea to use the foreign products on the basis of a significant size of the business, and our country's manufacture, sale, and low unit price.

First of all, since there are other investors who will invest 50 million won in the establishment of a 100 million won fake corporation, 50 million won is invested, the investment of 50 million won will establish a 100 million won fake corporation and operate a hedging project for pet.

It shall be deposited in one million won per month at the market price, and it shall be returned at any time if it is requested to collect the investment.

“...”

However, in fact, the defendant had been suffering from a serious financial crisis that the defendant had already operated, so he was thought to receive the investment money from the victim to use it as the operating fund of the (State)G, and the victim's investment money.

arrow