1. Defendant B received KRW 180,900,000 from the Plaintiff simultaneously with the Plaintiff’s payment:

(a) Appendix 1.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s respective real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

(2) Defendant B is the owner of the real estate indicated in attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant one real estate”) located within the said rearrangement project zone, in accordance with the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, for the purpose of removing previous structures located on the land of 15,356 square meters in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, E and for the purpose of promoting a housing reconstruction project that newly constructs multi-family housing, etc. on the same day.

3) Defendant C’s real estate indicated in paragraph (2) of the attached Table 2 located within the said rearrangement project zone (hereinafter “instant two real estate”).

A) The owner of the foregoing real estate is the mortgagee of the right to collateral security (hereinafter “instant right to collateral security”) with the maximum debt amount of KRW 72,000,000, which was received on July 18, 201 by the Incheon District Court Branch Decision No. 76742, Jul. 18, 201.

(4) Defendant D is the owner of the real estate listed in paragraph 3 of the attached Table (hereinafter “instant three real estate”) located within the said rearrangement project zone.

B. After obtaining the authorization for the establishment of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff sent each content-certified mail to Defendant B and C on March 9, 2012, and to Defendant D on March 20, 2012, demanding each of the above content-certified mail to reply within two months. Each of the above content-certified mail sent to Defendant B and C on March 12, 2012, and Defendant D on March 21, 2012, respectively. The Defendants did not reply to it for two months thereafter. (2) The Plaintiff sent a copy of the complaint of this case to the Defendants within two months from the expiration date of each of the above response period. (3) Article 39 of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Act No. 11293, Feb. 1, 2012).