1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The appeal cost includes the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

A. The reasoning for this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this case is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Even if the Intervenor is an employee who falls under the proviso of Article 4(1) of the Fixed-term Employment Contract after the enforcement of the Fixed-Term Employment Act, in light of the legislative intent of Article 4 of the Fixed-Term Employment Act, the Plaintiff’s expectation right to renew the employment contract cannot be deemed to be automatically excluded solely on the grounds that the Plaintiff is internal.

In the instant case, in full view of various circumstances recognized by the first instance court and the evidence adopted by this court, a legitimate expectation right is recognized that a labor contract may be renewed for an intervenor in light of the details of the relevant labor contract and the details of renewal, the standards for renewal of the contract, the actual condition of renewal of the entrusted workers of a workplace, the status of renewal of the entire job of an intervenor, and the status of the intervenor’s performance of duties. Since the Plaintiff, the employer, etc., did not have justifiable grounds for rejection of renewal, the notice of the expiration

On a different premise, the first Plaintiff’s assertion is rejected.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in conclusion as above.

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed because it is without merit.