beta
Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendant
Innocence.
Reasons
1. On July 201, 201, G, the main point of the grounds for appeal, brought the instant complaint against G, the Defendant, who was the Defendant, to pay the price immediately by bringing the high art works H (hereinafter “the instant fire”) equivalent to KRW 1.20,000,00 in the market price owned by the Defendant. However, without paying the sales price of the instant fire, he entrusted M, who did not know that the instant fire was not returned at the time of the occurrence of the instant fire, and as G did not clearly know the whereabouts of the instant fire, thereby making it doubtful the Defendant by deceiving the instant fire from the beginning. Accordingly, the lower court found the Defendant guilty on the ground that it erred by misapprehending the fact that the Defendant did not have any criminal intent to commit the crime of false accusation, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. Determination
A. The facts charged and the judgment of the court below (1) The Defendant is operating a high art shop from around 1985 to the high art shop and is currently operating in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as “D”.
Defendant’s end on May 2012 or
6. The facts at the office of F Judicial scrivener located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, for the first time around July 201, that the Defendant commissioned G to sell the instant Buddhist goods owned by the Defendant, and that G did not purchase the instant Buddhist goods from the Defendant, but G was the operator of the International Certified Judicial Scriveners for the purpose of having the Defendant subject to criminal punishment. The fact that G, the Defendant, the Defendant, was the person operating the International Certified Judicial Scriveners for the purpose of having the Defendant receive criminal punishment. Notwithstanding the intention or ability to pay the amount, even if he purchases the senior art goods from the complainant, it is not possible to pay the amount. However, around July 10, 201, in D’s operation of the complainant, the Defendant would sell the instant Buddhist goods of this case to KRW 120,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00,000 won.