1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The court of first instance rejected the Plaintiff’s claim on the confirmation of the existence of each obligation against the Defendant, the Codefendant D (hereinafter “D”) and F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”), and dismissed the Defendant and D’s claim on the counterclaim against each Plaintiff; and rejected the Defendant’s Intervenor’s claim on the part of the Defendant and D’s claim on the counterclaim against each Plaintiff; and the Defendant’s Intervenor’s claim on the part of F to the effect that the claim was transferred from F.

However, since only the defendant filed an appeal against the counterclaim among the judgment of the court of first instance, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the defendant's counterclaim claim.

2. The reasoning for this part of the reasoning is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(However, on March 3, 200, the reasoning for this part of the judgment on the Defendant’s counterclaim claim is as follows: (a) the reasoning for this part is as follows: (b) the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is that the Act on the Protection of Guarantee of Guarantee of Secrecy (amended by Act No. 13125, Feb. 3, 2015; hereinafter “Guarantee of Guarantee of Guarantee Act”) is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, except that the Act on the Protection of Guarantee of Guarantee of Secrecy (amended by Act No. 13125, Feb. 3, 2015;

(However, the defendant's counterclaim claim should be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.