logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2014.11.12 2014가단101446
계약금반환 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

(a) The reasons for the claim are as shown in the annexed sheet;

B. Determination: (a) The title holder of No. 12 and No. 3 is C, the Plaintiff’s mother, and C accompanied at the time of the instant transfer or acquisition agreement; (b) the instant singing practice room, the Defendant’s “Class 3 singing practice room”, lack of objective and clear materials, such as the transfer or acquisition agreement capable of proving the Plaintiff’s change to the “Class 1 singing practice room”; (c) lack of evidence to prove that the Defendant conspired with the Plaintiff, and there is insufficient evidence to prove that the Plaintiff, who had operated the “Class 2 singing practice room” in Gangseo-gu Seoul from September 201, had already been operating the instant singing practice room to the competent government office, etc. from the point of view of whether it is possible to change to the “Class 1 singing practice room”; and (d) the Plaintiff’s submission of the instant transfer or acquisition agreement to the Plaintiff on the condition or premise that it is possible to change to the “Class 1 singing practice room”; and (e) the Plaintiff’s submission of evidence to the Defendant’s business operator’s address and the Plaintiff’s non-one-one (the Plaintiff’s address).

2. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is without merit.

arrow