1. The Defendant’s KRW 195,704,365 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from October 30, 201 to October 31, 2014, as well as for the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition (1) The defendant is an insurer running an insurance business, which has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with B with respect to C vehicles.

(2) On October 30, 201, B driven the said vehicle on or around 15:55 on October 30, 201, while driving the said vehicle and driving the intersection with no signal of the front distance from the view of the East-gun, Bosung-gun, Bosung-gun to the front side of the Plaintiff’s D vehicle, which was proceeding from the front side of the front front of the driver’s seat, with the front side of the driver’s seat and suffered injury to the Plaintiff due to cerebral diseases and mathy caused by cerebral transfusion, etc., by shocking the front side of the driver’s seat.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry in Gap 1, 4, and Eul 1 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is liable for damages sustained by the plaintiff due to the accident in this case as an insurer that guarantees the traffic accident in B.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, the detailed statement of liability for damages in the attached Form.

(hereinafter referred to as "underlyings" shall be discarded, and shall be rejected unless otherwise stated).

The actual income shall be calculated on the basis of (1) vocational and income agricultural wages for women in rural communities.

Although the plaintiff asserts urban daily wage, it is reasonable to calculate the amount based on the rural female's wages as long as the plaintiff was residing in the rural area, engaged in the livestock industry, and physical appraisal was based on the premise of outdoor workers for day in rural areas.

(2) The Defendant asserts that the loss rate of 12% of the Mabrid List 9-B-356% of the Mabromothal disorder and operation capacity loss rate (A) caused by cerebral cerebral Sponism can only be recognized by applying G-1(B-1) items to G-3(B-1). However, intelligence in the examination of recognition function for the Plaintiff is average.