Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the chairperson of the "Promotion Committee for the Establishment of the Housing Reconstruction Improvement Project Association" that intends to promote reconstruction in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment B.

The chairperson of a promotion committee shall make public the documents and related data concerning the implementation of a rearrangement project in parallel with the Internet and by other means within 15 days from the date on which such documents and data are prepared or changed so that the association members, landowners, or tenants can know

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on January 31, 2016, did not disclose the “detailed details of monthly funds to be deposited and withdrawn on the Internet” within 15 days from the date on which the Defendant prepared the “detailed details of the monthly funds to be deposited and withdrawn on the Internet,” and did not simultaneously disclose 27 materials prepared in the same manner as the daily list of crimes (excluding No. 8 and No. 10 per annum) in the attached Table from January 16, 2015 to July 1, 2016, within 15 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Articles 86 subparag. 6 and 81 subparag. 1 of the former Act on the Maintenance of Urban and Residential Environments (amended by Act No. 13912, Jan. 27, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply) on criminal facts and the selection of fines [Articles 81 subparag. 1 and 86 subparag. 6 of the former Act on the Maintenance of Urban and Residential Environments (amended by Act No. 13912, Jul. 28, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply], the selection of fines [Articles 81 subparag. 1 and 86 subparag. 6 of the former Act on the Maintenance of Urban and Residential Environments (amended by Act No. 13912, Jan. 27, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply], were newly established

In light of the above provisions, legislative purport, and protection of legal interests, etc., it is reasonable to view that a crime of violating the law of non-violation of the law of urban and residential environment, such as this case, constitutes individual documents and related materials.

However, each crime of this case is not recognized as identical because all documents and related data are different. Thus, each crime of this case is in a substantive concurrent relationship.

1. Article 37 of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes Act.