1. The Defendant’s KRW 117,640,08 for the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s 6% per annum from December 1, 2013 to February 15, 2016.

1. The following facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3-1 to 8, 4-1 to 5, 5-1 to 4, 11-1 and 12, and Gap evidence Nos. 12, and the whole purport of the pleadings.

The Defendant issued an order to manufacture and sell group uniforms for the supply of enterprises by being granted the authority on the manufacture and sale (special sign) of group uniforms for the supply of enterprises from the black Track Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Bck”), and was engaged in the manufacture and sale of group uniforms for the use of enterprises by attaching the trademark of the black Track, and was ordered by the company planning (hereinafter “Good Person”) around early 2013.

B. On March 28, 2013, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to produce the instant water pool of KRW 5,600 per set at KRW 37,000, and the same year thereafter.

2.2. Entrustment with an addition of 37,000 won per set;

4. The Plaintiff supplied 11,600 sets of goods from around 15 to 19th of the same month.

C. Although the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to pay the instant goods, the Defendant rejected the instant goods on the ground that the instant goods were disposed of, and the Plaintiff discovered whether the goods were disposed of, the Korea Consumer Agency and the Korea Consumer Agency concluded that the defect was not confirmed on May 15, 2013.

The plaintiff again requested the defendant to pay the price of the goods of this case, but the defendant again refused to pay the price while there is a dye and furnal defect in the goods of this case.

On May 20, 2013, in order to resolve disputes arising from the defect in the instant goods, the Plaintiff renounced the payment for 5,000 sets among the instant goods and received the payment from the Defendant and the good person.