A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On May 23, 2019, at around 15:00, the Defendant took a bath to the victim D (the age of 66) without any justifiable reason in the vicinity of the Cridge in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, that “Choe fri, several homicides, several ages, and resident registration da.” The Defendant continued to “a Chewing knife” to the victim.

x) Spise and brue.

The balth of the victim was flaped by hand, and balth of the victim's balth.

Accordingly, the defendant committed assault against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 260 (1) of the Election of Imprisonment or Imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One month to two years;

2. The scope of recommendation [decision of types] according to the sentencing guidelines and the scope of recommendation [decision of types] violent crimes [No person who has a general assault [No person who has a special assault] [the area of recommendation and the scope of recommendation], the basic area of the punishment, and February through October.

3. 선고형의 결정 ◎ 불리한 정상 ; 종전에 폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)죄 등으로 실형, 징역형의 집행유예, 벌금형으로 각 처벌받은 범죄전력이 있고, 특히 2018. 8. 17. 이 사건의 피해자를 폭행한 범죄사실로 벌금 100만 원의 약식명령을 발령받은 범죄전력이 있는데도 그때로부터 불과 1년도 되지 않은 시점에 같은 피해자에 대해서 같은 종류의 이 사건 범행을 범한 점, 피고인이 범행을 계속 부인하면서 반성하지 않고 있는 점 등 ◎ 유리한 정상 ; 폭행의 정도가 그리 중하지는 않은 점 등 ◎ 그 외에 피고인의 연령, 성행, 환경, 범행 전후의 정황 등 이 사건 재판과정에 나타난 여러 양형의 조건을 종합하여 주문과 같이 형을 정한다.