Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for up to eight months.

However, the defendants are individually from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2013, the Defendants were the workers who entered into a labor contract with E, which was awarded a subcontract for the part of the construction work for the underground floor molded construction work of 101, 106, 107 East underground floor (hereinafter “instant construction site”) among the newly constructed construction sites for D apartment buildings (hereinafter “instant construction site”).

1. At around 03:00 on March 4, 2014, the Defendants cut the locks corrected in the middle part of the workshops (the part installed in the middle part of the entrance in the middle part of the upper steering room) using iron bars installed at 106 dongs of the instant construction site, in advance, to intrude into the front steering room installed at 106 dongs of the instant construction site.

As a result, the Defendants jointly damaged the property owned by the injured company in the market.

2. Any person who intends to hold an outdoor assembly or demonstration shall submit a report stating the reported matters to the chief of the competent police station from 720 hours to 48 hours before commencing the outdoor assembly or demonstration;

Nevertheless, the Defendants, from 05:30 on the same day to 05:30 on the same day, left a flock card stating the phrase “the direct employment dispute by multi-level subcontract closure” and demanded the withdrawal of unfair dismissal and the conclusion of collective bargaining.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to hold an outdoor assembly without submitting a report to the chief of the competent police station.

3. Defendants from around 03:00 on March 4, 2014

3. From 15:30 on April 24, 200, by occupying other workshops in use at the construction site of this case without permission, the workers interfered with the work of transporting large materials and large equipment, and workers interfered with their work by hanging them with a plastic finite which contains their own changes in work at the other workshops.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the new construction work of apartment by the damaged company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each part of the defendants.