logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.23 2017누46495
체류기간연장등불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasons for this court are as follows: (a) The first instance court’s reasoning is as follows: (b) “In the case of the Jeonju District Court’s Gunsan Branch 2016ddan1775 of the Jeonju District Court case No. 2016ddan1775 of the 2016, Apr. 20, 2016, which was brought by the Plaintiff after the Plaintiff became divorced to B pursuant to the final and conclusive decision of recommending settlement as of Apr. 20, 2016, the former District Court’s Gunsan Branch 2016ddan1775 of the 2016, and (c) B may have responded to mediation with the condition that the Plaintiff would not make a monetary claim under any pretext, such as consolation money and division of property, and thus, the above mediation content alone is insufficient to deem the Plaintiff to have no cause for failure in the marriage, and therefore, it shall be cited as it is

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow