A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 04:00 on June 12, 2013, the Defendant driven a D-to-be-be-on-house with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.221% while under the influence of alcohol at a section of about 30 meters from the front parking lot located in Jeju City to the parking lot adjacent to the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on detection of drivers and circumstantial statements of drivers;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reasoning for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is as follows: (a) even though the Defendant had a record of being sentenced to a fine due to a drunk driving in 2010, the Defendant was running the instant drunk driving; (b) at the time, the blood alcohol concentration level came to reach 0.221%, and so, the Defendant selected imprisonment with prison labor as it appears to have driven in the state of drinking; (c) the Defendant was not subject to punishment due to a drunk driving except the above fine; and (d) the Defendant was in violation of the depth without being punished due to a drunk driving; and and