The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) of the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable. It is limited to 160 hours of community service order imposed by the lower court and 40 hours of lecture attendance order for compliance driving.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the degree of the victim's injury caused by the instant accident is not heavy, that the defendant's mistake is against depth and there is no criminal record of suspended execution or more, the defendant's blood alcohol concentration at the time of the instant accident was very high to 0.246%, and that the defendant caused an accident that is shocking pedestrians due to dangerous driving, that the defendant was punished due to a crime after a traffic accident, that there was a criminal record before and after a drunk driving, that the defendant was not agreed with the victim, that the vehicle of the defendant was not covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance, and that the defendant was not covered by the defendant's comprehensive automobile insurance, and that other sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments such as the defendant's age, character, character, and environment, it seems inappropriate for the court below's sentence to be too unreasonable, and that the order to provide

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.