The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendant is against the gist of the grounds for appeal, the punishment imposed by the court below against the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the instant crime was recognized, and that there was no record of punishment for the same criminal facts, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

However, there is a large number of victims, the amount of the defrauded money by each victim is not much sufficient, the victims failed to reach an agreement with the victims up to the trial and did not make efforts for recovery from damage, etc. are disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances, such as the character, conduct, environment, etc. of the Defendant, the lower court appears to have taken into account most favorable circumstances for the Defendant, and there is no change of circumstances that would vary between the lower court and the sentence.

Therefore, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The judgment below

Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 11369, Feb. 22, 2012; Act No. 11369, Aug. 23, 2012; Act No. 11354, Feb. 22, 2012; Act No. 11354, Aug. 23, 2012; Act No. 13554, Feb. 25, 2015; Act No. 1484, Feb. 2

.