1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On February 3, 2009, there is no dispute between the parties that the Plaintiff received from the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital the surgery of the Malian Malian Malian Malith Malith Malith Malith Malith and the Malith Malith Mali

2. 원고의 주장 원고는, 이 사건 백내장 수술을 받은 후 시력이 완전히 회복되지 않고 눈이 심하게 부시며 눈물이 제대로 나오지 않아 뻑뻑하고 눈이 아프다고 주장하면서, 이는 피고의 수술상 잘못으로 발생한 것이 분명하므로 피고는 원고에게 발생한 손해를 배상하여야 한다는 취지로 주장한다.

3. In order to seek damages due to a doctor’s tort in a medical lawsuit for judgment, the causal relationship between the doctor’s negligence medical practice, the occurrence of damages, the cause for negligence and the damage should be proved, respectively. The plaintiff at least has the responsibility to claim and prove the act of medical negligence based on the ordinary common sense in a series of medical procedures.

However, in the lawsuit of this case, the plaintiff does not prove that there was any violation of the duty of care during the medical treatment and operation of the medical staff of the defendant hospital, despite the fact that the plaintiff had been again proved by the full bench, and as such, there is no evidence of assertion about the specific damages incurred to the plaintiff. Thus, there is no room for further examination of the plaintiff's claim of this case.

4. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim of this case is without merit.