A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 4, 2018, around 05:05, the Defendant was forced to pay taxi charges from the victim C (54 years old) who is a taxi driver, while under the influence of alcohol, without paying the taxi charges, at the front of Daegu Dong-gu B, Daegu, Daegu, 2018.

“In doing so, the victim’s knife knife knife both knife and knife knife knife with both knife and knife knife with the cell phone held by the victim, and the victim suffered injury such as salt knife and tension in the part of the knife requiring treatment for about 14 days

2. On August 4, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the Daegu Dong Police Station E-gu, Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, on the ground that there is a complaint in the investigation process while voluntarily accompanying the said district for the said district for the said reasons, the Defendant dlimf belonging to the said district, e.g., a slopeF belonging to the said district for the reason that there is a complaint in the investigation process, and e.g., the Defendant dlimged him/her on his/her hand and her shoulder and chest part, etc. of G with his/her hand, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes, and maintenance of public order and order.

3. The Defendant damaged public goods at the time, time, and place specified in Paragraph 2, who was arrested in the act of committing a crime suspected of obstructing the performance of official duties as seen above. However, the Defendant: (a) walked one studio 1,000 won at the market price, and one studio 1,15,000 won at the market price, and a computer monitor at the rate of 180,000 won at the market price on the table of the following table, carried a computer monitor at the rate of 180,000 won at the market price on the table; and (b) destroyed the wind, table, and computer monitors, which are public goods in total of 675,00 won at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and C;

1. Investigation reports [Presentation of Written Estimates for Damage (Public Goods, such as Teable Corners)] and investigation reports (victim C.