Text
1. On December 6, 2016, the Defendant confirmed that a disciplinary action against the Plaintiff for a period of ten years of suspension of performance of rights is invalid.
2...
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The status of the parties is a clan consisting of descendants of the "E" recorded in Dmaga, and the plaintiff is a member of the defendant's clan who has been performing the defendant's general affairs similar to that of the defendant for several hundred and twenty years before October 7, 2005.
On the other hand, the defendant among the two novels of the clans of the clans, the defendant refers to the above clans as "six-year-old clans" in various documents. B. On December 17, 2005, the plaintiff and the defendant in the previous dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant have interfered with the defendant's business and damaged the property of the plaintiff and the defendant intentionally.
“For the reason that the disciplinary action was decided to suspend the performance of rights for a period of 10 years (hereinafter “the disciplinary action in 2005”).
On June 19, 2006, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of each of the above resolutions against the Defendant to the effect that “The resolution at an ordinary general meeting of shareholders elected by the Defendant on November 7, 2005 from the executives and delegates of the Defendant was made in the presence of those who do not have the right to vote, and the resolution at an ordinary general meeting of shareholders on December 17, 2005, which decided to take disciplinary action against the Plaintiff and F for a period of ten years against the Plaintiff and F, was made by the executives and delegates elected through the above invalid general meeting of shareholders, and thus all of the above resolutions are to be confirmed as invalid.”
On December 13, 2006, the above lawsuit was concluded with mediation to the effect that "the defendant confirms that the disciplinary action against the plaintiff and F against the plaintiff is null and void" was concluded.
C. On December 13, 2005, when the period of suspension of qualification expires, the period of suspension of qualifications will be the end of December 13.
However, even though it is still desired to consider the cancellation of qualification suspension in the middle of the year in which it is not against the mistake, it does not seem to be against the opposition yet, and it is the mother in charge of the Cheongju's own needs.