logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.05.11 2016나2070605
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts (1) The Plaintiff is a corporation established on November 29, 2012 for the purpose of software development business, etc.

On the other hand, the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. established on July 10, 1997 for the purpose of software development business, and the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. established on August 18, 2003 for the purpose of software development business. The plaintiff and the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd, all of which are the principal office of the plaintiff and the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd, have been the Seoul Jongno-gu E and 4th, and the plaintiff and the representative director of the representative director F and the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. of the plaintiff and the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. were the couple, and the defendant entered the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd, and used all of the plaintiff, the

(2) On June 1, 2013, the Defendant entered into the Dispute Resolution and participated in the development of the language committee (hereinafter referred to as “instant language committee”) that promptly connects the pertinent site when entering Korean language into the Internet homepage address window from June 11, 2013.

(3) On June 11, 2013, the Defendant signed and delivered to the Plaintiff a letter of undertaking (Evidence A 1) stating the following, with respect to the development of the instant fishing system:

(2) Of the agreement on the penalty of breach of contract under Paragraph (4) of this Article, the term “agreement on the penalty of breach of contract” refers to the development of the term “project.” The term “project” as set out in the following commitment refers to the development of the term “the term “the term” in the Plaintiff’s core project). It is aware that the project is an important project with the Plaintiff’s involvement in the Plaintiff’s core project and planning/ Strategy-making/making/implementation of the project, and that the maintenance of security should be much more important than other project or trade secret security matters, and that the project will make every effort to protect relevant information within the company or outside the company, regardless of whether it is affiliated or withdrawn by the company, so that the project is not leaked.

1. Omitted;

2. Omission;

3. A storage medium, etc. that contains relevant information shall be kept and used only at a designated place and private.

arrow