beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 18, 2008, the defendant sentenced the Incheon District Court to three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and three years and six months of imprisonment for the same crime in the same court on January 18, 2012, and on April 7, 2016 in the same court on April 7, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gangnam Prison prison on February 17, 2018.
"2019 Highest 721" means that the Defendant, while entering a restaurant, did not have the intent or ability to make a normal payment after pretending customers, was provided with the order of alcohol, alcohol, etc., and received the order by using the gap in the surveillance of the restaurant operator.
1. Violation of the Aggravated Punishment Act;
A. On July 21, 2019, at around 22:30, the Defendant: (a) infringed on the said restaurant and ordered an alcoholic beverage to take profits from the victim’s property in front of the DNA store operated by the victim C, which was in front of the original city; and (b) took advantage of the gaps in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected, the Defendant stolen the victim’s mobile phone locks located on the table; and (c) took a 200,000 won in cash owned by the victim, which was located on the table.
B. On July 22, 2019, around 23:24, 2019, the Defendant: (a) invaded on the said restaurant with a view to stealing the victim’s property prior to Gju, operated by the Victim F; and (b) stolen the victim’s property in front of the Gju-si, and ordered the alcohol and the transportation of the victim; and (c) stolen the victim’s property with a gal-gal-gal-gno 7 mobile phone owned by the victim with a gal-gal-gal-galam equivalent to one million won at the market
C. At around 01:00 on July 23, 2019, the Defendant infringed on the said restaurant with the intent to steals the victim’s property in front of the J restaurant operated by the Plaintiff I, and ordered the victim to take advantage of the gaps in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected, the Defendant stolen the victim’s mobile phone owned by the victim of KRW 3.50,000 at the market price on the table.