Text
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Determination on the legitimacy of a lawsuit
A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) and the defendant, F, G, H, and I have operated the E Department as a partnership business. However, the defendant, F, H, and G (hereinafter "defendant, etc.") are the defendants, F, H, and G (hereinafter "defendant, etc.").
(2) On September 5, 2013, the Joint President meeting held that the plaintiffs would withdraw from the partnership with the defendant on September 20, 2013, and approved the voluntary withdrawal of the defendant, etc. at the Joint President meeting on September 20, 2013. Despite the absence of a resolution to reverse the withdrawal of the defendant, the defendant et al. selected the defendant as the representative director on January 20, 2014 and committed unlawful acts such as change of the business registration and the representative of the passbook, unfair orders and unfair labor practices against employees and obstruction of treatment of the plaintiffs in the previous name of the plaintiff A. Meanwhile, the relationship with the defendant et al. was terminated on September 5, 2014 while the plaintiffs withdrawn from the E division with the defendant et al. on September 5, 2014, but the defendant et al. filed a criminal complaint with the defendant for forgery of private documents and embezzlement of business, and thus, the investigation against the plaintiffs at the time of the same business.
B. 1) Determination 1) Even in the past legal relations, in a case where it has an impact on the current rights or legal status, and it is recognized as a valid and adequate means to obtain a judgment on confirmation of such legal relations in order to eliminate risks or apprehensions with respect to the current rights or legal status (see Supreme Court Decision 2010Da43580, Sept. 30, 2010). 2) First, in light of the above legal principles, the litigation seeking confirmation of such legal relations is more beneficial to confirmation (see Supreme Court Decision 2010Da43580, Sept. 30, 2010).