logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.15 2017고정1852
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2.5 million, Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are people working in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a street store.

"2017 High 1852"

1. A, B, and C committed a crime on November 7, 2016, around November 17, 2016, and around November 17, 2016, around the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Defendant B committed an assault, such as, around November 7, 2016, that Defendant A, B, and C committed an unlawful crackdown on the packaging horse that illegally occupied and used the road by public officials of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office’s post-Gu office’s F on the roads in front of Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and Defendant B b

As a result, Defendant A, B, and C jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials of Seocho-gu Office on the regulation of street occupation.

2. The crime committed on November 8, 2016, Defendant A, B, and C committed assault and assaulted at the same place as around November 17:30, 2016 at around 17:30, and at the same time, Defendant A, B, and C, a public official of the Seocho-gu Office F, Seocho-gu Office, committed a crackdown on the packages and horses illegally occupied and used by G, etc., to prevent access to enforcement officers.

As a result, Defendant A, B, and C jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the public officials of Seocho-gu Office on the crackdown on the street, and Defendant A, B, and C assaulted the Defendants on November 4, 2016, including I, J, K, and L, etc., who were public officials in charge of the control when the public officials of Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu who illegally occupied and used roads in front of the Seocho-gu Seoul, on November 4, 2016.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by public officials in the process of administrative vicarious execution, and at the same time, the victim J set up a right leash salt in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim K, the victim K on the left-hand side in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim L on the left-hand side in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 High Court Decision 1852]

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A, B, and C

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Investigation report (Seochocho-stopy photo analysis) and screen photographs of dynamic images (2017 Go fixed 2179);

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A, B, and C 1.

arrow