beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A and B jointly list 35,143,768 won and the attached list of “the details of the steel bars treatment” among them.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. From December 1, 2012, the Plaintiff had Defendant A serve as a material quality manager at the D New Construction Site located in the Jeonju-si.
B. During the period from November 12, 2013 to April 3, 2014, Defendant A embezzled steel materials worth KRW 35,143,768 (mans less than KRW 35,143,768) in collusion with Defendant B, an employee of the new steel company, in collusion with Defendant B, who was an employee of the new steel company, and stored government-funded steel materials not stored at the construction site, as if they were received from the construction site.
C. Although Defendant A received KRW 6120,000,000 on December 27, 2013, and KRW 6120,000 on January 27, 2014, as the price of cement supplied from the former cement company from a limited liability company, Defendant A embezzled each of the above money without depositing the Plaintiff’s account.
Although Defendant A received KRW 20,749,520 of the aggregate supply price from the friendly industrial company from May 16, 2014 to November 18, 2014, Defendant A embezzled without depositing the said money into the Plaintiff’s account.
E. On January 26, 2015, Defendant A entered into a donation agreement with Defendant C (Defendant A’s wife) on the E large 490 square meters and F large 463 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). On the same day, Defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer based on such agreement.
F. On February 27, 2015, Defendant C completed the registration of initial ownership as to the multi-family house of 171.18 square meters and 61.2 square meters of 2 stories of multi-family house of 171.18 square meters of multi-family house of 171.18 square meters and 61.2 square meters of 2 stories (hereinafter “instant building”).
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry in Gap evidence 2 through 10 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the Plaintiff’s recognition of the part on the claim for damages against Defendant A and B, Defendant A and B jointly share the same list as to each of the money listed in the “amount” column in the separate sheet as tort against the Plaintiff, 35,143,768 won in total due to embezzlement of the said steel materials.