The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant operates the printing business with the trade name "C" in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

The Defendant did not obtain permission from the competent authorities, from around 1994 to August 27, 2013, installed and operated a printing machine (80 marc (4 marc), which is a noise emission facility, at the first floor of the above place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes entered in the written statement prepared by D;

1. A prosecutor under Article 57 subparag. 1 of the Noise and Vibration Control Act regarding facts constituting an offense was indicted under Article 87 subparag. 1 of the Noise and Vibration Control Act, but it appears to be an obvious clerical error under Article 57 subparag. 1 of the Noise and Vibration Control Act.

Article 8(1)(Selection of Fines)

1. The sentence shall be suspended in light of various circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as: (a) there is no history of punishment against the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the punishment to be suspended: a fine of KRW 500,000 per day; a fine of KRW 50,000 per day; and a favorable condition to be considered for the reasons of sentencing under the following consideration); (b) the revision of the Enforcement Rule has mitigated the regulatory standards; and (c) there are circumstances that may be less concerns over actual noise due to the technological development; and (d)