1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on April 30, 1998, and was promoted to a slope on March 1, 2012.

From May 14, 2014, the Plaintiff served as the C Team patrol staff in the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station B District.

B. On June 17, 2014, the Defendant violated Articles 56, 57, and 59 of the State Public Officials Act, Article 8 of the Regulations on Duties of Police Officers for the Protection of Human Rights (Prohibition of Violence, Cruel Act, etc.) and Article 6 of the Police Inspection Regulations, and thus, constitutes grounds for disciplinary action under Article 78(1) of the State Public Officials Act. Around June 17, 2014, the Defendant issued two-month suspension disposition against the Plaintiff.

On March 4, 2014, at around 13:07, the first floor of the E Hospital located in Pyeongtaek-si D sent to the site after receiving a report of 112 stating that he frighting a drinking and drinking frighting, and the civil petitioner sent to the site, who interferes with the duties and duties of the hospital center, and interfere with the civil petitioner's performance of duties, such as obscing the plaintiff who was called to the site, and neglecting the duties and duties of the hospital, and committing the crime of obstruction of duties and insult, by arresting the civil petitioner following his arms, and making him go to the zone, and the civil petitioner goes to go to the zone after he was arrested. Even if the civil petitioner refuses to go to go to the zone, two police officers dispatched to the zone may put two arms and go to the zone, but he did not respond to the performance of duties properly, causing the civil petitioner's physical harm to the area near the hospital by causing the civil petitioner's excessive physical harm, and immediately causing the civil petitioner's arrest to the area by up to 7 meters from the hospital.

B. Although civil petitioners’ interference with and arrest of civil petitioners within the E Hospital secured in B to verify the facts of civil petitioners’ civil petition, the CCTV images recorded in the process of performing their duties are presented as they are, the B A.M. district unit on April 21, 2014.