Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates “E”, and Defendant B is a person who operates “F”.

1. Defendant A, on September 9, 2015, posted a “E” Stick for public relations on the 1st floor corridor in substantial G 1st floor in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si on September 19, 2015, Defendant A, who is running “F,” from the victim H (n, 50 years old), who is running by her husband, to start the place of business in the south.

“” Dubling the bat and bating the bat of the victim who spats and clothes attached thereto, and pushed the bat of the chest, and batd at once by drinking the victim’s bat.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the impairment on the left-hand side of the bad faith requiring treatment for about 14 days.

2. The Defendant B discovered that H, the mother of the Defendant, was attached to the Victim A (37C) at the time, time, and place described in paragraph 1, and found that the Defendant her mother was fluored with the Victim A (37) and a trial, and the Victim A was fluored with “to throw away this fluor,” and the Victim A was fluored with the chest of the Victim’s chest, was pushed away with the Victim’s fingers, plucked by the Victim

As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as cutting the bones of fingers.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Witness B (Defendant A)

1. The witness A’s testimony (defendant B)

1. Partial testimony of the witness H;

1. Witness I;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Each injury diagnosis certificate (H and A);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the parts of the victim H himself/herself;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants who choose a sentence: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty Penalty)

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendants and their defense counsel did not perform the same behavior as stated in the facts constituting the crime, and the Defendants’ actions are “reasonable acts that do not go against social rules and are legitimate acts that are aimed at defending the other party’s unfair infringement.”