The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment with prison labor for one year suspension, two years of community service work, 120 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of the crime, and his mistake is divided, and the degree of the assault is not hot.

However, the crime of this case is committed by assaulting a police officer who performs official duties and obstructing the performance of official duties, and there is a need to strictly punish the defendant in consideration of the recent situation of public authority. The defendant has been punished several times due to violent crimes, etc., a fine, a suspended execution, and a suspended sentence, and there has been a record of having been punished several times due to the same kind of crimes, among which the crime of this case has been committed several times, and the damaged police officers have failed to receive a letter, and other factors of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is unfair because it is too excessive.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da36442, Apr. 1, 200).