The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

D suicide on December 4, 201, while serving as a worker belonging to the Headquarters E of the Army Water Supply and Medical Services Association E, and F was a major head of the headquarters above, and the defendant was a person who served as a representative of the headquarters above, and a person who was appointed as a representative of the headquarters like D at the above headquarters level.

On October 8, 2013, at the Seoul Central District Court court located in Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, the Defendant appeared as a witness at the trial 524870 court, which held that the above D’s bereaved family member filed a claim for damages against the Republic of Korea, and then the Defendant’s agent’s “F Captain has been actually consulted with D.”

’ 라는 질문에 ‘ 시스템상 오류를 이용하여 면담 일지를 작성한 것처럼 꾸몄습니다

The answer to “F testified as if the date for making an interview with D was earlier than the date of the actual preparation, using the system error of the inside network of the military forces.”

However, it is impossible to prepare a interview log using the system errors of the inside network of the military forces, and therefore, F did not have prepared a date for preparing a interview log with D retroactively than the date of actual preparation, and the Defendant did not know whether F prepared a interview log with D retroactively.

Nevertheless, the defendant testified that he was guilty of false facts against his memory as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Evidential materials;

1. An interview log (Death D);

1. An investigation report (related to analysis of the interview conducted by H) / [The Defendant alleged that “the interview conducted on the day when the interview was held is not immediately prepared, and thus stated as stated in the facts constituting an offense” (486 pages of the investigation record). The content of the Defendant’s testimony in the court does not mean that “the interview conducted on the day when the interview was held” did not immediately prepare an interview.