logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.05.01 2019노1673
모욕등
Text

All judgment of the court below shall be reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 사실오인 1) 제1원심과 관련하여 피고인은 카카오톡 단체 채팅방인 ‘C’에 제3자가 작성한 글을 공유하였을 뿐이고, ‘D’, ‘E‘에는 메시지를 작성한 사실이 없다. 또한 제2원심 중 피해자 T에 대한 부분(2018고정1944 사건), 제3원심 중 별지 범죄일람표 연번 2 내지 8번, 9번 중 “개잡뇬아”라고 한 부분, 10 내지 12번, 제4원심 중 별지 범죄일람표 연번 1번, 2번 중 “달셋방 고소가 답이다!!..”라고 한 부분, 4 내지 17, 19 내지 28, 30 내지 63번은 제3자가 피고인의 아이디를 도용하여 작성한 것이다. 2) 피고인에게 피해자들을 모욕하거나 공포심과 불안감을 유발할 고의가 없었다.

B. The sentence of unfair sentencing (the first instance court: the fine of one million won, the second instance court: the fine of two million won, the third instance court: the fine of three million won, the fourth instance court: the fine of two million won, and the fourth instance: the fine of two million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Each judgment of the first or fourth original courts rendered on the defendant's ex officio judgment, and the defendant filed an appeal against the above judgment of the court below, and the court decided to hold the above cases together with other judgments of the court.

Each crime of the first or fourth original judgment against the defendant is one of the concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and thus, one sentence should be imposed pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act. Therefore, the above original judgment cannot be maintained as it is.

However, despite the above reasons for ex officio destruction, the defendant's assertion of misunderstanding of facts is still subject to the judgment of this court, and this is examined below.

3. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. According to the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court below as to whether the defendant's Kakao Stockholm messages were prepared, the defendant insultings or repeatedly promulgated the victims at the Kakao Stockholm Group as stated in each of the facts charged at the court below's first to fourth trials.

arrow