beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of the import household trade business, etc., and concluded a lease agreement with the Defendants on the whole first floor (hereinafter “the leased object of this case”) among the buildings listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant building”). The Defendants are married couple and leased the leased object of this case to the Plaintiff.
B. On August 5, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Defendants and the subject matter of the instant lease with three years (including a special agreement that the lessor agrees when the lessor and the lessee demand the extension of the lease term before the expiration of the lease term) from August 5, 2010 to August 4, 2013, that the lease term shall be extended two years under the same conditions from August 5, 2010 to August 4, 2013.
C. Before the Plaintiff’s lease, the subject matter of the instant lease was used as the Hari Private Teaching Institute, and the Plaintiff removed the leased object and constructed a human test for the purpose of operating the household store.
While the Plaintiff operated the furniture store in the name of “C” in the leased object of this case, an accident that damages the household, etc. kept by the Plaintiff with water on the floor of the leased object of this case was occurred on August 17, 2012.
(hereinafter “instant accident”) e.
After the instant accident, the Plaintiff: (a) was waterproofed on September 2012, 201.
F. On the other hand, on July 6, 2012, Defendant A requested the Plaintiff to inspect and repair the instant building by asserting that the Plaintiff incurred ruptures, water leakages, etc. in the instant building due to the removal and interior works performed by the Plaintiff, but notified the Plaintiff of the fact that the instant lease contract was terminated on August 4, 2013, as the Plaintiff did not comply therewith.
G. The Plaintiff’s notification on April 1, 2013 is the Defendant.