logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.02.21 2017고단2226
사기등
Text

A. Imprisonment with prison labor for a crime set forth in Articles 1 and 2-A of the judgment of the defendant, and for the remaining crimes set forth in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On January 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution as a result of injury in the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on January 29, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On July 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E that “A victim E may enjoy profits from KRW 10 million from KRW 6 million to KRW 10 million only on the part of the money within the horse race track but only with the money within the city, and may increase profits from KRW 20 million to KRW 20 million within six months each week.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he received money from the damaged person for his personal purpose, so there was no intention or ability to make profits even if he received money from the damaged person.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was delivered KRW 20 million as the loan money around July 31, 2015 to the injured party.

2. Special intimidation (victim D);

A. On December 2, 2015, the Defendant threatened the victim’s part of the G building in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, 000, with the victim’s residence D, and with the victim’s excessive damage, which is a dangerous object in the main room after the victim’s death, and threatened the victim’s neck.

B. On February 16, 2016, at around 10:30 on February 16, 2016, the Defendant, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a), and at the time of dispute between the victim and female issues, expressed the victim’s desire to “Sechopha” and expressed the victim’s illness, which is a dangerous thing in the room, and threatened the victim with the victim’s head.

3. The Defendant of assault (victim H) set up a signboard on the roadside on the ground that the Defendant’s act of drinking in front of 03:00 as of the end of January 2016, 2016, together with the act of drinking, such as the victim H, is not good after drinking alcohol, and the victim’s act of drinking at the end of 03:00,000; and whether the victim’s act of drinking the horses would bif the victim “N h h h h h h h h h h

“In the end, the victim’s bridge.”

arrow